PDF download of the Preliminary Outline:

1.jpg
2.jpg
3.jpg

4.jpg
5.jpg

Works Cited

  1. Allen, S. (2002). Looking for learning in visitor talk: A methodological exploration. In G. Leinhardt, K. Crowley, and K. Knutson (Eds.), Learning conversations in museums (pp. 259-303). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  2. Anderson, D., and Nashon, S. (2007). Predators of knowledge construction: Interpreting students’ metacognition in an amusement park physics program. Science Education, 91(2), 298-320.
  3. Anderson, D., Lucas, K. B., & Ginns, I. S. (2003). Theoretical perspectives on learning in an informal setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 177-199.
  4. Ash, D. (2003). Dialogic inquiry in life science conversations of family groups in a museum. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 138-162.
  5. Ash, D., Crain, R., Brandt, C., Loomis, M., Wheaton, M., & Bennett, C. (2007). Talk, Tools, and Tensions: Observing biological talk over time. International Journal of Science Education, 29(12), 1581-1602.
  6. Beaumont, L. (2005). Summative evaluation of wild reef-sharks at Shedd. Report for the John G. Shedd Aquarium. Available: http://www.informalscience.com/ download/case_studies/report_133.doc [accessed October 2008].
  7. Blanton, W., Mayer, R., Gallego, M., McNamee, G., Shustack, M. (2006) The quantitative effects of Fifth Dimension participation on children’s cognitive and academic skills. In M. Cole & the Distributed Literacy Consortium (Eds.), The fifth dimension: An after-school program built on diversity (pp. 107–128), New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  8. Bremme, D., Blanton, W., Gallego, M., Moll, L. C., Rueda, R., & Va ́squez, O. (2006). The dynamics of change in children’s learning. In M. Cole & the Distributed Literacy Consortium (Eds.), The fifth dimension: An after-school program built on diversity (pp. 107–128), New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  9. Bronte-Tinkew, J., Moore, K. and Shwalb, R. Measuring Outcomes for Children and Youth in Out-Of-School Time Programs: Moving Beyond Measuring Academics. Washington, DC: Child Trends, October 2006.
  10. Brosi, E. (2011) Measurement Tools for Evaluating Out-of-School Time Programs: An Evaluation Resource
  11. Cole, M. and The Distributed Literacy Consortium. (2006). The Fifth Dimension: An after-school program built on diversity. Russell Sage Foundation.
  12. Dancu, T. (2006). Comparing three methods for measuring children’s engagement with exhibits: Observations, caregiver interviews, and child interviews. Poster presented at 2006 Annual Meeting of the Visitor Studies Association, Grand Rapids, MI.
  13. EganRobertson, A. (1998). Learning about culture, language, and power: Understanding relationships among personhood, literacy practices, and intertextuality. Journal of Literacy Research, 30(4), 449-487.
  14. Ellenbogen, K.M. (2002). Museums in family life: An ethnographic case study. In G. Leinhardt, K. Crowley, and K. Knutson (Eds.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  15. Ellenbogen, K.M., Luke, J.J., and Dierking, L.D. (2004). Family learning research in museums: An emerging disciplinary matrix? Available: http://www3.interscience. wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/109062559/PDFSTART [accessed March 2009].
  16. Fadigan, K.A., and Hammrich, P.L. (2004). A longitudinal study of the educational and career trajectories of female participants of an urban informal science education program. Journal of Research on Science Teaching, 41(8), 835-860.
  17. Falk, J.H. and Adleman, L.M. (2003). Investigating the impact of prior knowledge and interest on aquarium visitor learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 163-76.
  18. Falk, J.H., Moussouri, T., and Coulson, D. (1998). The effect of visitors’ agendas on museum learning, Curator, 41(2), 107-120.
  19. Fadjo, C.L., Lu, M.T. & Black, J.B. (2009). Instructional Embodiment and Video Game Programming in an After School Program. In G. Siemens & C. Fulford (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2009 (pp. 4041-4046). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  20. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59.
  21. Harris, E. (2012). Afterschool Evaluation 101: How to evaluate an expanded learning program.
  22. Hull, G. A., & Katz, M. L. (2006). Crafting an agentive self: Case studies of digital storytelling. Research in the Teaching of English, 43-81.
  23. Kickmeier-Rust, M. D., & Albert, D. (2010). Micro Adaptivity: Protecting Immersion in Didactically Adaptive Digital Educational Games. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26, 95-105.
  24. Leinhardt, G., & Knutson, K. (2004). Listening in on museum conversations. Rowman Altamira.
  25. Leinhardt, G., Crowley, K., & Knutson, K. (2002). Learning conversations in museums. Psychology Press.
  26. Leinhardt, G., Tittle, C., & Knutson, K. (2002). Talking to oneself: Diaries of museum visits. Learning conversations in museums, 103-133.
  27. Loh, C. S., Anantachai, A., Byun, J., & Lenox, J. (2007). Assessing what players learned in serious games: in situ data collection, information trails, and quantitative analysis. 10th International Conference on Computer Games: AI, Animation, Mobile, Educational & Serious Games (CGAMES 2007), July (Vol. 2528).
  28. Maloney, J. H., Peppler, K., Kafai, Y., Resnick, M., & Rusk, N. (2008). Programming by choice: urban youth learning programming with scratch. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 40(1), 367-371.
  29. Meyer, R. L., Bevan, B., & Garza, P. (n.d.). Museums Afterschool: Principles, Data, and Design.
  30. Mislevy, R. J., Almond, R. G., & Lukas, J. F. (2004). A brief introduction to evidence- centered design (CSE Report 632). CA: Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED483399)
  31. Moussouri, T. (1997). The use of children’s drawings as an evaluation tool in the museum. Museological Review, 4, 40-50.
  32. Nasir, N. S. (2005). Individual cognitive structuring and the sociocultural context: Strategy shifts in the game of dominoes. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(1), 5-34.
  33. O’Neill, M.C., and Dufresne-Tasse, C. (1997). Looking in everyday life/Gazing in museums. Museum Management and Curatorship, 16 (2), 131-142.
  34. Perry, D. L. (1993). Measuring learning with the knowledge hierarchy. Visitor Studies: Theory, Research and Practice: Collected Papers from the 1993 Visitor Studies Conference, 6, 73-77.
  35. Pivec M (Ed.), (2006) Affective and emotional aspects of human-computer interaction; Game-Based and Innovative Learning Approaches. Vol.1: The Future of Learning (IOS Press, 2006).
  36. Polman, J. L. (2006). Mastery and appropriation as means to understand the interplay of history learning and identity trajectories. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 221-259.
  37. Rahm, J. (2002). Emergent learning opportunities in an innercity youth gardening program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(2), 164-184.
  38. Rockman Et Al. (2007). Media-based learning science in informal environments. Background paper for the Learning Science in Informal Environments Committee of the National Research Council. Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/ bose/Rockman_et%20al_Commissioned_Paper.pdf [accessed October 2008].
  39. Scaffidi, C., & Chambers, C. (2011). Skill progression demonstrated by users in the Scratch animation environment. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
  40. Schmidt, R. (2010). Building a Badge Framework to Ignite Student Learning Identities. Digital Youth Network. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in collaboration with the MacArthur Foundation
  41. Shaffer, D. W., & Gee, J. P. (n.d.). The Right Kind of GATE: Computer games and the future of assessment.
  42. Shaffer, D. W., Hatfield, D., Svarovsky, G. N., Nash, P., Nulty, A., Bagley, E., Frank, K., et al. (2009). Epistemic network analysis: A prototype for 21st-century assessment of learning. International Journal of Learning, 1(2), 33-53.
  43. Shernoff, D. J., & Vandell, D. L. (2007). Engagement in after-school program activities: Quality of experience from the perspective of participants. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36(7), 891-903.
  44. Shute, V. J. (2011). Stealth assessment in computer-based games to support learning. Computer games and instruction. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishers.
  45. Shute, V. J., Ventura, M., Bauer, M. I., & Zapata-Rivera, D. (2009). Melding the pow- er of serious games and embedded assessment to monitor and foster learn- ing: Flow and grow. In U. Ritterfeld, M. Cody, & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Serious games: Mechanisms and effects (pp. 295–321). Mahwah, NJ: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.
  46. Steinkuehler, C. (2008). Cognition and literacy in massively multiplayer online games. In D. Leu, J. Coiro, C. Lankshear, & K. Knobel (Eds.). Handbook of Research on New Literacies, (pp. 611- 634). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.
  47. Stevens, R., and Toro-Martell, S. (2003). Leaving a trace: Supporting museum visitor interpretation and interaction with digital media annotation systems. Journal of Museum Education, 28(2), 25-31.
  48. Stone, L. D., & Gutiérrez, K. D. (2007). Problem articulation and the processes of assistance: An activity theoretic view of mediation in game play. International Journal of Educational Research, 46(1-2), 43-56.
  49. Thompson, S., and Bonney, R. (2007, March). Evaluating the impact of participation in an on-line citizen science project: A mixed-methods approach. In J. Trant and D. Bearman (Eds.), Museums and the web 2007: Proceedings. Toronto: Archives and Museum Informatics. Available: http://www.archimuse.com/mw2007/papers/ thompson/thompson.html [accessed October 2008].
  50. Vandell, D. L., Reisner, E. R., & Pierce, K. M. (2007). Outcomes linked to high-quality afterschool programs: Longitudinal findings from the study of promising afterschool programs. University of California, Irvine and Policy Studies Associates, Inc.
  51. William T. Grant Foundation (2011). From Soft Skills to Hard Data: Measuring Youth Program Outcomes.